نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
بلوار ارتش شهر محلاتی میدان فتح فتح ۲ بلوک ۹ واحد ۱۰
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
The phenomenon of the “blame-rejecter being blamed for the same mistake” in Islamic ethics has usually been interpreted with transcendental readings; however, this concept can be explained quite naturally within the framework of moral philosophy, without eliminating narrative and psychological contexts. The issue of this research is why and how a derogatory judgment about another exposes the moral agent to moral lapse; a question that is of fundamental importance from the perspective of character theory, the coherence of judgment, and the structure of self-consciousness. The aim of the research is to provide a philosophical explanation that can extract a common mechanism between three conceptual levels—virtue-based analysis, Kantian universalism, and existentialist reading of the moral role—while at the same time using psychological evidence and narrative rereading to strengthen the analysis. The research method is conceptual-analytic, and data are collected from the Islamic moral tradition, moral psychology, and philosophical theories of agency, and then reconstructed within the framework of a single analytical system. The findings show that derogatory blame in virtue ethics disrupts the stability of character and leads to excess; in the Kantian system, it disrupts the principle of universality and causes the collapse of the coherence of practical reason; and in the existentialist approach, it exacerbates the gap between the “moral self” and the “moral role.” Psychological evidence on projection, self-deception, and attentional bias, and Islamic narrative evidence on self-neglect also confirm the same cycle. The conclusion of the research is that affliction can be considered the natural consequence
کلیدواژهها [English]
)